While killing time recently, I ran across this rant posted on the Opinion page of CNN.com, written by Dean Obeidallah, who is apparently “a political comedian,” and a former attorney, among other things. Well, we don’t think he was trying to be funny in this column.
In fact, I take issue with his tone.
Obeidallah’s basic point is that—wait for it–America is too litigious. Certainly not new material. He uses a recently-filed lawsuit against the TV doctor personality “Dr. Oz” as the latest evidence for this theory. Apparently, a diabetic man is suing Dr. Oz because the remedy Dr. Oz suggested caused the man to suffer burns on his feet. Of course, as Obeidallah notes, the gentleman seems to have ignored some of the basic instructions for the remedy. You can read more about the lawsuit here. Obeidallah then continues his column by providing a list of other “ludicrous” lawsuits (although we noticed that he does not mention the infamous Stella Liebeck McDonald’s Hot Coffee case).
Obeidallah’s verdict on the reasons for our litigious society? A perfunctory “Blame the lawyers” slogan, especially plaintiffs’ personal injury lawyers, who hope for a quick settlement “so that they can do as little work as possible before seeing their own payday,” and “taking a questionable case that will reap you some media coverage and money.”
Now, we here at Abnormal Use have worked with–and against–a number of hard-working, honorable plaintiffs’ personal injury lawyers who are not just good, but great, attorneys. We’ve also worked with some who didn’t quite hit the mark.
But we’ve met and worked with just as many great and not-so-great lawyers on our own side of the bar.
Despite his anger, Obeidallah does make one point that we don’t see often in such analysis. There are a “growing number of lawyers out there struggling to make ends meet,” he says. He might be on to something. According to a recent Wall Street Journal column, there are approximately 21,800 new legal jobs each year for the approximately 44,000 law school graduates. Those numbers don’t crunch. Hungry lawyers, Obeidallah suggests, might be more willing to take a questionable case simply to keep their practices afloat.
There is, of course, a larger conversation in the legal community these days—about the role of law schools, the quality of legal education, and the available jobs for graduates and seasoned lawyers alike. We will continue to monitor these issues, comment upon them, and invite your input, as well. We hope that the tone of these discussions remain civils, and don’t always have to be accompanied by column headings as abrasive as Obeidallah’s “Dr. Oz suit is another reason people hate lawyers.”
We think these heavy subjects deserve a more nuanced approach than that.