Depicted above is the cover of Batman Gotham Adventures #27, published not so long ago in 2000. Here’s our question: If Batman has been, as the cover suggests, “wrongfully accused” and jailed, why have his jailers permitted him to remain in costume? Surely it is a violation of the Gotham City Detention Center’s policies and procedures to permit a criminal defendant to remain in costume. We suspect that Batman ultimately escapes this predicament, but we also surmise that if he had been revealed to be Bruce Wayne during his confinement his flight from justice would have been much, more difficult. By the way, this is not the first time we’ve looked at a cover from this series. See here for a similarly puzzling cover.
According to this tweet by our own Stuart Mauney, the South Carolina Bar House Delegates debated the rule against perpetuities yesterday. There’s something we never thought we’d hear of again. What next? The rule in Shelley’s case?
For years and years, we’ve loved The Onion. This week, that satirical paper published a piece entitled, “Supreme Court Overturns ‘Right v. Wrong.’” That’s big news.
Lawyerist asks its lawyer readers: “Is Facebook ruining your life?” We’ll get back to you on that one.
Jeremy Grabill of The Product Liability Monitor pauses to comment upon the release of Susan Saladoff’s “Hot Coffee” documentary on DVD. Grabill notes: “[F]or every sympathetic plaintiff that Ms. Saladoff (the film’s producer/director) presents, there are no doubt an equal (if not greater) number of truly frivolous claims that could be chronicled, especially in the mass tort context.” As you know, you can follow our continuing coverage of that film and the fabled Stella Liebeck McDonald’s hot coffee case here.